We began this lecture by asking 'what is an argument?' and were given three types of argument from this:
Rational, emotional and rhetorical. A rational argument is taken by philosophers who try and reason with evidence and solutions. They usually follow a deductive argument which has a logical form. An example of a deductive argument is: i) All people are mortal. ii) Socrates is a person. iii) Therefore Socrates is mortal. However, they may also follow an inductive argument which is based on empirical evidence (which is evidence that relies on the senses). Inductive arguments are contingently true.
Rhetorical arguments are used by Sophists (360 BC) which used persuasion. It was received negatively in Ancient Greek but it was re-evaluated in post-modern context.
We then moved onto images that could be used as an argument and we began by looking at the Gestalt Shift with the image of the rabbit/duck.
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/45/Duck-Rabbit_illusion.jpg
This image is labelled as an illusion as there is two ways of looking at it. From one perspective, it looks like a duck and from the other perspective, it looks like a rabbit. However, you can't see both animals simultaneously. It is an intensive experience as it has a logic of thresholds although it is still centred on representational form.
We then looked at another image that followed the idea of distortion and perception. It was Hans Holben the Younger who created the piece- The Ambassadors in 1533.
http://users.clas.ufl.edu/tharpold/resources/holbein/index.html
This image could be quite easy to create with photoshop in recent day, however, this image was hand painted. The image of the skull at the bottom of the painting can only be seen when it is looked at from the side. However, when you can see the skull, you are unable to see the rest of the image.
The person on the left is a traveller and the person on the right is a member of the clergy. Both of these people are supposed to portray different views of what happens after we die. The inclusion of this distorted skull is supposed to signify that, whatever happens, you are still dead at the end. However, you have to look from a different point of view and ignore the other points of view to see the blunt message of the painting. This makes it a vanitas painting.
A similar thing was recreated by Robert Lazzarini in 2000. He 3D printed a distorted skull from real bone.
http://db.westcollection.org/sites/default/files/rlazzarini872_0.jpg
This followed a similar idea of distortion as you could only see the skull if you looked at it from a certain angle. Lazzarini was alluding to Holben's painting.
This lecture was interesting as it give yet more background information to art which can support my studies and will come in handy when revising and referencing different time periods. I found it very interesting and shows how powerful image can be.


















































